Weekly Market Update: Port congestion isn't dealt with interest rate hikes

Market Update

Equities in most major markets edged higher last week, partly offsetting the previous week’s losses, with global stocks up +0.3% in GBP terms. US stocks were up +0.4% despite the disappointing jobs report published on Friday. European stocks were up +0.2% amid high volatility while UK stocks were up +1.0% despite the BoE’s new Chief Economist raising the alarms on inflation’s persistence in the coming months. Globally, energy stocks outperformed all sectors for a fifth week in a row, posting solid gains of +4.9%, followed by financials, utilities and materials. The US 10Y Treasury yield was up 15.0bps, finishing the week at 1.612%, while the UK 10Y yield was up 15.6bps reaching 1.158%. Sterling rose by +0.5% against the US Dollar. In USD terms gold pulled back by -0.6%, while oil was up by +4.1%, reaching $81 per barrel.

CIO Analysis

As inflation is rising and energy prices are soaring, central banks are preparing to deal with the possibility of having to raise interest rates to fight it. In the past three days, key Bank of England officials have noted that inflation pressures are rising and may cause long-lasting damage, prompting markets to sharply increase their UK rate expectation and the Pound to rally.

Meanwhile, the Fed has said that asset purchase tapering is on the cards in the next two months and interest rate hikes near the end of 2022, while the ECB last week noted that “inflation risks are now tilted on the upside”.

The question before us is: The world’s major central banks are arguably the most powerful institutions run by unelected leaders. They are staffed by some of the brightest economic minds available. The analysis produced internally informs decisions that will affect millions upon millions of consumers and businesses across the globe. Their conclusions and intentions are followed by almost all significant investment organisations, corporate treasuries and business leaders in the world.

And when inflation goes up, surely they must raise rates.

Far be it from us to ever question their divination. And yet, it beggars belief to assume that their weapon of choice to deal with port congestion is … interest rates.

Central banks appear to be faithful disciples of two pieces of theory:

One: Milton Friedman’s “inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon”. Inflation is a result of more money into the system leading to higher demand. Flush that money away by raising the cost of money, and we should return to equilibrium prices.

Two: Inflation expectations are self-fulfilling prophecies. If only people can believe higher rates will fight inflation, then surely inflation should come down.

Policymakers should question whether these two tenetshold. Milton Friedman died in 2006, 94 years old, never having fully experienced globalisation let alone de-globalisation. He described a very different world, even if energy prices are reminiscent of the 70’s. Yet what we are experiencing today is a profound disruption in global supply chains that transcends energy price volatility. It is the first stress test of a global system built in the last thirty years to transfer anything, everywhere in a matter of days. A system we attacked politically, before Covid-19 attacked it physically, and without a credible alternative. Hiking interest rates might have worked in the late 70’s, but a tool with a nine-month horizon is too slow to solve the port congestion problem. According to global shipping behemoth Maersk, this congestion is unlikely to resolve itself before 2022. And even if it does, higher rates on top of soaring energy prices could seriously inhibit the confidence of a consumer tempered by two decades of secular stagnation.

As for inflation expectations needing to fall, the words of Fed researcher Jeremy B. Rudd, “mainstream economics is replete with ideas that “everyone knows” to be true, but that are actually arrant nonsense”. The link between inflation and inflation expectations is backwards. Expectations, surveys really, reflect what has already transpired, not what is newly expected. So ‘talking’ future rates up might steepen the yield curve enough to keep pension funds afloat, but beyond that, it has little to do with actually fighting inflation.

If major central banks meaningfully raise rates before any serious fiscal easing in the US and the EU, we fear that we could be staring down the barrel of a policy mistake. For the time being, we assume that hawkish rhetoric is used to influence the yield curve and maintain the illusion of control of the economy. We thus remain dovish, and equal weight in risk assets, in line with what we believe are the true intentions of the world’s central banks.

David Baker, CIO

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *