Weekly Market Update: Stocks Steady on US Earnings Growth

Market Update

Despite concerns about coronavirus continuing to dominate headlines, markets on the whole edged up last week, with global equities gaining +1.2% in local terms, which translated into a +0.1% gain for UK investors. The resignation of UK Chancellor Sajid Javid saw Sterling rise along with gilt yields. Javid’s replacement, Rishi Sunak, is expected to allow greater fiscal spending, which saw the Pound gain +2.3% vs the Euro and +1.2% vs the US Dollar. US equities reached record highs in part due to solid corporate earnings data, gaining +0.6% in Sterling terms. European equities were up +1.4% in local terms, although fell -0.6% in Sterling terms, while Emerging Market equities gained +0.3%. Japanese equities had a poor week, down -1.7% in local terms, and fell further this morning after GDP fell -6.3% QoQ in Q4 on an annualised basis. UK equities fell -0.5% in a mixed week; on an individual stock basis Centrica announced losses of £1.1bn and RBS announced a 3p dividend which disappointed investors, while the high commodity weighting meant that coronavirus fears weighed more heavily than for other regions. With yields rising gilts fell -0.2%, however US 10Y yields were flat and German 10Y yields fell -1.5bps. In US Dollar terms oil gained +3.4% and gold gained +0.9%.

CIO Analysis

The Coronavirus may keep spreading and the death-toll rising on a daily basis, but equity markets again hit new highs on the back of the near-conclusion of a much better than expected US earnings season. From a narrative perspective, we have passed from “the coronavirus is contained” to “the coronavirus will in all likeliness have a short-term effect on Q1 output”, much like SARS did in 2003. The truth is that we still know little of the virus. On the positive side, the outbreak is in a reasonably contained territory. On the negative side, diagnosis is still lacking and containment becomes more difficult over time. Last week, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health professor Marc Lipsitch told the Wall Street Journal that a global pandemic affecting as much as 70% of the population is “likely”. With a 1% to 2% mortality rate (depending on the country and quality of healthcare services) this scenario would clearly have more than a “temporary” effect on the global economy. It would likely affect the buoyant and exuberant stock market which seems to be on a permanent liquidity high. What can investors do? It is very difficult to put a probability on a tail risk. What is “likely” for one professor is less likely for another and a different story altogether for a trader. Stories of plagues have always scared and sensationalised humanity, but they rarely come to fruition. In the 2016 Ebola virus outbreak, for two weeks we were one step away from a global pandemic worth its own Hollywood movie series. However the outbreak was contained. Increasing cash or decreasing risk assets is not the play in this particular situation. It is rather watching for hard signs that the virus might not be contained anymore and hope that stock market exuberance will give decision makers enough time to decrease risk. Unless that happens, difficult as it may be and tragic as the situation is on the ground, from an investment perspective we must consider coronavirus news as less powerful than the ability of central banks to fuel higher prices for risk assets.

David Baker, CIO

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *