Fight the Fed… when it’s hawkish (and a few words about Germany)

Market Update

Stock indices in most developed market regions rebounded strongly after Monday’s acute sell off amid fears of Evergrande’s default – global stocks were up +0.7% in GBP terms. EU stocks were up +1.7% despite business activity losing steam, while US stocks rose +1.0% after recording their biggest daily drop since May 12th, on Monday. UK stocks rose by +1.0% as the BoE announced that rates will be unchanged; however holding a more hawkish stance. Globally, Energy stocks continued their upward trend posting solid gains of +4.0% followed by financials, IT and consumer discretionary. The US 10Y Treasury yield was up 8.9bps finishing the week at 1.453%, while the UK 10Y yield was up 7.4bps reaching 0.922%. Sterling fell by -0.4% and -0.3% against the USD and the Euro respectively. In US Dollar terms gold rose by +0.2%, while oil was up by +3.4%.

CIO Analysis

Last week featured somewhat of a paradox: A more hawkish than expected Fed during a brewing Chinese economic crisis, and still buoyant markets. The rate decision by the FOMC, the Fed’s rate-setting body, suggested that asset purchases might be tapered as early as November and end by mid-next year. Pragmatically, market optimism may well be justified. Investors get another eight months or so of assured QE, during which time several events could delay or even reverse the ending of this round of QE: Covid-19 advancing having a more significant economic impact than currently expected (try to get gasoline at a BP petrol station this weekend?), Chinese volatility spreading or even the Euro going through another existential crisis in the post-Merkel era.

Moving from ‘ultra’ to ‘simple’ monetary accommodation doesn’t lead to an automatic correction. It simply increases the probability of a correction that may test the Fed’s resolve and broadens the range of events that can cause it. While the Fed often talked a hawkish game over the past twelve years, it consistently reneged when market conditions became challenging, choosing to quickly affirm the Fed Put over any concerns about moral hazard.

A more hawkish tone may challenge a correction, but there are no reasons to believe that the Fed won’t immediately revert to a dovish outlook when that happens.

In the past twelve years, the investor motto was ‘don’t fight the Fed’. While this may hold true for a dovish Fed, it has certainly paid to ‘buy the dips’, even the larger ones, and wait for the Fed to come around.

Meanwhile, there’s much talk about the German elections. Yet, the results were hardly surprising. Angela Merkel’s retirement brings political upheaval and horse-trading. What was always certain was that Ms Merkel’s ring of (European) power would not be passed on. Her dominance in the European political stage was a result of circumstance, personality, deft statesmanship, longevity and luck. The exact combination of these can’t be found in any other European leader.

Therefore, we are entering a new post-Merkelian era, one where the centre of European political influence will gravitate towards France. Assuming Mr Macron survives his own electoral ordeal next year, he will be in a better position to leverage the largest military power in the continent, the second-largest economy and a French politician holding the keys to the ECB.

-David Baker, CIO

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *