WEEKLY MARKET UPDATE: EASING OF LOCKDOWN RESTRICTIONS BOOSTS EQUITIES

Equity markets continued to steadily recover last week, with all regions positive or flat in Sterling terms and only Emerging Market Equities down in local terms. Markets have been reacting positively to the gradual opening up of economies across the world, even with some signs that the Coronavirus is re-emerging in areas such as Wuhan where cases had fallen to almost zero. IT, Energy and Consumer Discretionary were the top performing sectors; IT is somewhat an outlier as the crisis has played to the sector’s strengths, while Energy was buoyed by another gain of over 20% in the Oil price, however these are three of the most cyclical sectors, emphasising the bullish nature of last week’s move. US equities lead the way, up +4.3% in Sterling terms, although the outperformance compared to the rest of the world was in part doe to a weak close the previous week. UK equites also performed strongly, up +3.1%. Japanese equities gained +2.8%, Emerging Market equities +0.2%, while European equities were flat. Sterling was mixed, up +0.6% vs the Euro but down -0.8% vs the US Dollar. UK 10Y Gilt yields fell marginally to 0.235% (Gilts gained +0.6% for the week), while US 10Y Treasury yields rose to 0.683%. Meanwhile Gold was flat in US Dollar terms.

View from the Desk

The S&P 500 is again near 3000 points, while the tech-heavy NASDAQ turned positive for the year (the S&P is still roughly 10% below December 31 levels). Bond markets are so bullish as to expect negative rates in the US, like in Europe. This may come in contrast to the still developing Covid-19 situation, expectations of a second wave or the realisation that a vaccine will not be available anytime soon. It may even come in sharp contrast to unemployment figures out of the US (the EU is furloughing 40m workers which don’t count as unemployed), and sapping business and consumer sentiment indices. However, our 11-year experience with Quantitative Easing suggests that markets and economies may move out of lockstep for a long time. QE was a tool designed specifically to help banks out of trouble by increasing liquidity even when the 0% interest rate threshold had been met. With tougher capital buffer restrictions, banks funnel that extra liquidity into stock and bond markets to improve their balance sheets, creating large demand for risk assets. QE may have a positive initial economic impact when credit has been frozen. But it is well documented that its economic efficacy beyond that point is significantly lower. At this point QE serves one purpose: to prevent real economy malaise from fuelling a market panic, plunging the economy into a vicious circle. The problem is that Covid-19 fears and sharply rising unemployment are enough to do just that. Thus currently, we don’t view the market as a predictive mechanism of the economy but rather a mechanism intentionally propped up to balance and moderate adverse economic effects. How long can this dichotomy last? As long as we trust fiat currencies and we don’t experience strong inflation.

David Baker, CIO

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *