WEEKLY MARKET UPDATE: US-CHINA RHETORIC UNNERVES MARKETS

Markets rallied throughout last week, however US equities closed lower on Friday and down -1.6% in Sterling terms for the week, with other regions following suit this morning, on concerns that tensions between the US and China could escalate due to accusations from the US administration over the origins of the Coronavirus. For the week, in Sterling terms, European equities led the way, up +3.4%. Emerging Market equities also gained +2.7%. UK large-cap equities gained only +0.2%, hampered by poor performance in Royal Dutch Shell which cut its dividend for the first time since WWII. Meanwhile Japanese equities lost -0.1%. UK 10Y Gilt yields fell 4.3bps while US 10Y Treasury yields rose 1.1bps, with Gilts as a whole flat for the week. Sterling had a mixed week, gaining +1.1% vs the US Dollar and +0.6% vs the Japanese Yen, but down -0.4% vs the Euro. Oil saw a large percentage rise, up over 20%, although the gain in $ terms was less noteworthy given the low starting value. The commodity remains over -65% down YTD. Meanwhile Gold was negative for the week, down -1.7% in US Dollar terms.

View from the Desk

Financial professionals have spent the time between 2008 and 2020 trying to reconcile what they were seeing in the markets (stocks up 5.5x since the depth of the recession), what the statisticians said (global economic growth around 3.5% per annum) and what they were looking at on main street: small businesses just getting by and real incomes stagnating. It is with disbelief that they witness another stock market rally against significantly worse fundamentals. US stocks up more than 20% since their lows and trading at 20-year high multiples, while at the same time numbers suggest a record recession (US Q1 GDP was -4.8% annualised and off the back of a bad March), uncertainty as to the progression and longevity of the pandemic and real questions about consumption thereafter. “It’s QE stupid!” the bulls say, and “a classic Bear Market rally” argue the bears. We believe the question is more complex. Markets are running on the belief that another transfer of wealth is coming, like it did in 2008, as central banks conjure up non-inflationary money out of thin air. And it’s coming. Meanwhile, main street businesses sink in despair knowing that they will not get a similar deal and are getting ready to close down in the face of uncertainty on consumer behaviour for the foreseeable future. And they are right too. Can they both be right? The answer is yes. Large-cap companies can adjust more quickly. It was Domino’s Pizza which first came up with a system to deliver takeaway in a contactless manner to bolster consumer confidence in their product. And it is big companies with the cash flow and fat to burn that may more easily survive the crisis. They also have access to deeper capital markets. Central banks can disburse money faster than main street banks or governments. So what is happening is classic economic theory. Capitalism is getting slimmer. What turned restaurant owners into restaurant franchisees is now turning the franchisees into employees. Capital will be readily available, but not to everyone on the same terms. This is what the discrepancy between main street and Wall Street is informing us of. Of course there will be repercussions over the longer term, but right now very few are thinking five years down the line. As asset allocators, however, we have to. Which means that for the time being we stick with our allocation to risk assets, listening to Wall Street. However we can’t ignore that the system is not working for the many and it will have to adapt or perish. A such wealth managers need to think holistically, not just in terms of investments, but also in terms of taxes (more coming soon), drawdowns (volatility on the way) and overall strategic financial planning. The wealth managers to survive the next step in this evolution of capitalism will be the ones who realise that wealth itself will change along with it.

David Baker, CIO

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *