WEEKLY MARKET UPDATE: A MORE SANGUINE WEEK FOR MARKETS

By regular standards it was a rocky week for equities, which rallied 2-3% in the first few days, but fell 4-5% later on. However in comparison to preceding weeks market moves were somewhat muted, perhaps because the news-flow has provided little further clarity as to the time-scale and magnitude of the COVID-19 crisis – markets were already braced for rising casualty figures while governments and central banks have played their cards. Global equities fell -1.2% in Sterling terms, although were off slightly more in local terms, as Sterling fell -1.5% vs the US Dollar but rose +1.6% vs the Euro. Emerging Market equities were the only region offering positive returns to UK investors, in part as it was the only region with negative returns in the previous week. Conversely, having rallied hard last week, Japanese equities fell -7.1%. UK equities fell -2.0%, US equities -0.5% and European equities -1.7%. Energy was the best performing sector globally as Oil rallied 31.8% in US Dollar terms, although is still down over 50% YTD. However other cyclical sectors, Financials and Consumer Discretionary, performed the worst as markets priced in further economic woes. Yields for 10Y Gilts and 10Y Treasuries were down -5.6bps and -8.0bps, however Gold fell -0.5% in US Dollar terms in a mixed week for ‘safe haven’ assets.

CIO Comment

Albert Einstein once said that, “Compound interest is the eighth wonder of the world. He who understands it, earns it; he who doesn’t, pays it.” Exponential mathematics is about speed, which is why the coronavirus has overtaken healthcare systems so quickly. Given extreme “social distancing”, which we have never before seen in an organised manner globally, it took about 90 days to reach a million confirmed cases, 4x longer than otherwise. Unfortunately, the economic consequences of the pandemic are also exponential. A shop takes a few days to close down, but a new one months to open. Despite the massive and unprecedented amount of monetary and fiscal stimulus, we are quickly reaching a tipping point where the economic repercussions will become equally exponential and permanent in a way that will require significantly more stimulus to balance. In this scenario, governments may finally have to take on the role they had happily bequeathed to central banks in the last decade, and underwrite risk for main street businesses, a model which would see the demise of Liberal Capitalism and the advent of China-like State Capitalism. So this is the conundrum: relaxing the measures could risk a significant rise in mortalities. If we don’t relax the measures before a tipping point is reached, we risk our economic system. The only good scenario is that we stall the virus long enough to find a cure, but not long enough to end our economic system and consumer behaviour. Still, our analysis suggests that asset allocation still works. Large and listed companies with enough cash, which comprise most of our underlying bond and equity assets, will probably continue to operate, despite the loss of earnings, as governments take on some of the business risk through fiscal stimulus, while cash-strapped smaller competitors may go out of business. In a world where online shopping will probably become even more of a staple, large early movers are already weathering the storm. The true conversation is what happens to bonds. It will be very difficult to escape a zero-yield world in the next few years, which likely means a negative real yield for bond holders, who will be reliant on central banks acting as strong buyers. This is the prime reason to still hold them as a diversifier in portfolios.

David Baker, CIO

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *