The Election Paradox

The election tomorrow is somewhat of a paradox. On the one hand, it has been dubbed “The most important election in decades”, one that can “shape the next generation”. On the other hand, however, it offers little visibility when it comes to UK portfolios.

Strange as it may seem, both statements might hold true.

Throughout the past few years, the British electorate has been steadfast in its request that the status quo should change. The parties have listened and have placed unconventional leaders at their helms. Both Conservative and Labour leaders can credibly promise that the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland will be a different place after December 13^th. 

The next government will oversee the biggest change in status quo the UK has seen in decades. The only question, for citizens and investors alike is what does this really mean, and how it addresses their uncertainties.

A Conservative win would mean more certainty about the structure of the economy, but uncertainty over trade with the EU, the country’s largest trading partner. A Labour win could mean more certainty over Europe (could is the operative word) but less certainty over the overall economy. The only thing the two parties agree on is willingness to incur higher deficits to spend money on the economy.

Investments, especially in real assets, such as factories or homes, tend to be illiquid and time-binding, which means that a certain degree of forward visibility is required. If one does not know either what one’s market is, or what the business climate will be, neither of which will be convincingly answered on the day after the election whatever the outcome, then one may defer of even cancel a big spending decision. Predictably, underinvestment has been a significant headwind for economic growth, especially in the past three years.

Nevertheless, one might argue, what if investors chose to believe and buy in early on electoral promises, hoping that either Conservatives will deliver the “Brexit dividend” and achieve a record-time trade deal with the EU, without compromising the UK’s integrity, or Labour will successfully demolish income and wealth inequalities that hamstring real growth and usher in an era of inclusive growth.. 

Even if that were the case, it would still leave long term investors in a bind. The UK economy is one of the most open systems in the world, its trajectory concomitant with the global economy. The world has been suffering from a slowdown mostly induced by the traumatic 2008 experience which has reduced demand for investments and consumption. Coupled with miserable demographics, surging trade tensions, crushing debt levels and a significant Chinese slowdown, it is no wonder why our time is often called “secular stagnation”, a pseudonym, for “Japanification”. Before 2008, the world was growing by 5%. Now, on a good year global growth is slightly above 3%. Add Brexit and business climate uncertainties into the mix and one can see how investors may only trust the strongest of investment cases. Any chink, or even potential chink in the armour is big enough doubt for portfolios facing a world that has barely been growing for a decade. 

Even if the outcome of the election was certain, which we feel that due to tactical Remain voting and shifting electoral demographics (a third of British citizenship applications now come from EU nationals, as opposed to 12% before the election) is far from the case, fact remains that UK risk assets lack the forward visibility which would make them an iron-clad investment case for international portfolios. We thus feel that investors will stay on the sidelines until a comprehensive and realistic view of what the UK will look like in 10 years has emerged. Can this take place in January 2020? Maybe. But chances are the process, and thus the uncertainty, might be a bit longer than that.